Back to Portfolio
AILegalTechLaw EnforcementSaaSCompliance

Sarge AI

Jurisdiction-aware AI legal intelligence platform for law enforcement officers

Sarge AI

A jurisdiction-aware AI platform that helps law enforcement officers access approved legal authority and draft court-defensible affidavits without hallucinations.

Key Outcomes

  • Faster affidavit drafting under real-world time pressure
  • First-line AI legal review before supervisor escalation
  • 100% citation-backed AI responses from approved sources only

Quick Facts

  • Industry: Law Enforcement / Public Safety
  • Platform: Secure Web + iOS & Android Mobile Apps
  • Architecture: Single-tenant per department
  • Services: Product architecture, AI safety design, UX, compliance workflows

Background

Law enforcement officers operate in environments where speed, accuracy, and legal defensibility are non-negotiable. Yet critical legal guidance—case law, statutes, departmental policies—often lives across fragmented systems, PDFs, or institutional memory.

The client set out to build a high-trust AI legal intelligence platform that officers could rely on during patrol, incident reporting, and warrant preparation without introducing new legal or compliance risk.

The mandate was clear:

AI must assist, not speculate. And it must never hallucinate.

The Challenge

Business Challenges

  • Affidavits rejected due to missing probable cause or jurisdictional errors
  • Rising legal exposure from inconsistent interpretations
  • Over-reliance on senior officers for legal validation
  • High-pressure environments with little room for second guesses

Technical & Legal Challenges

  • AI hallucination risk in a zero-tolerance domain
  • Jurisdiction-specific law that varies by department
  • Strict CJIS-aligned access control and auditability
  • Ensuring AI outputs could withstand legal scrutiny

Operational Pain Points

  • Manual affidavit drafting and review
  • Slow feedback loops
  • Inconsistent application of policy and precedent

The Solution

Stackup designed and built a single-tenant, jurisdiction-aware AI legal intelligence platform, purpose-built for law enforcement.

1. Jurisdiction-Aware AI with Hard RAG Gating

  • Strict Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
  • AI responses generated only from approved, published documents
  • Automatic refusal when no sufficient legal authority exists
  • Every response includes explicit citations:
    • Case references
    • Statute numbers
    • Policy documents

2. AI-Assisted Affidavit System (Core Differentiator)

The affidavit workflow was designed as a compliance safeguard, not an autopilot.

End-to-End Flow

  • Officer inputs text, uploads files, or dictates via voice
  • AI asks structured follow-up questions
  • System validates:
    • Probable cause
    • Jurisdiction alignment
    • Legal consistency
  • AI drafts affidavit language without altering officer-provided facts
  • Flags:
    • Missing probable cause
    • Jurisdiction mismatches
    • Potentially unlawful actions
  • Officer retains full control over submission

Affidavits are standardized per department and fully searchable for precedent reuse and analytics.

3. Secure Mobile Experience for Officers in the Field

  • Secure onboarding with OTP, biometrics, and device registration
  • Text and voice-based AI chat with citations
  • Voice session replay for affidavit dictation
  • Integrated perimeter drawing tool for scene documentation
  • Designed for use during patrol, not just at a desk

4. Governance, Review & Policy Memory

  • Role-based access (Super Admin, Department Admin, Officer)
  • Document approval lifecycle: Draft → Submitted → Approved/Rejected → Published
  • Daily review of flagged AI responses
  • Structured policy memory for approved corrections
  • Immutable audit logs for all sensitive actions

5. Enterprise-Grade Architecture & Security

  • Single-tenant isolation per department
  • Encryption at rest and in transit
  • CJIS-aligned access controls
  • Immutable audit trails
  • Separate Super Admin console for governance and onboarding

Built and deployed over a 6+ month delivery cycle.

Implementation Process

Phase 1 – Architecture & Risk Modeling

  • Defined “AI must never do X” constraints
  • Designed refusal-first AI patterns
  • Modeled jurisdictional isolation

Phase 2 – Core AI & Document Intelligence

  • Built ingestion, versioning, and metadata pipelines
  • Implemented strict RAG enforcement
  • Validated citation traceability

Phase 3 – Affidavit & Mobile Workflows

  • Designed officer-first UX under time pressure
  • Integrated voice, drafting, review, and flagging
  • Implemented department-specific templates

Phase 4 – Governance & Pre-Launch Hardening

  • Audit logs, quality metrics, admin workflows
  • Pilot preparation for 5 departments

Results (Pre-Launch Signals)

While the platform is pre-launch, early validation showed:

  • Increased officer confidence during affidavit preparation
  • Reduced dependence on senior officers for first-pass legal review
  • Early detection of:
    • Jurisdictional mismatches
    • Missing probable cause
  • Clear positioning of AI as a first-line legal reviewer, not a decision-maker

Want Similar Results?

Let's discuss how we can build a solution that delivers measurable impact for your business

Schedule a Strategy Call